Jinsook Ohta
A++
provisional — 100% — 5 of 5 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 1% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
22cases reviewed on appeal
249opinions authored
249panels sat on (not as author)
22%reversed, in whole or part, of 18 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 14 vacated 3 reversed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 6 vacated 3 reversed 2
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 7 · 2023 6 · 2024 5 · 2026 4 ·
Analysis
6 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases authored (every role)
- Mehboob Shah v. Desert Auto Group V LLC
- Shane v. County of San Diego
- In Re: Szanto
- Szanto v. Bank of New York
- In Re: Szanto
- Hammerlord v. Elliott
- Torfason v. Internal Revenue Service
- Santana v. Hemmerling
- Burgess v. Shakiba
- Santana v. Hemmerling
- Pfeifer v. Dexcom, Inc.
- Marin v. Catano
- Kelly v. Wedge Wood
- Thompson v. NSC Technologies, LLC
- Woodson v. Carranza
- Butler v. Landeros
- Nguon v. Madden
- Ludlow v. Flowers Foods, Inc.
- Greer v. County of San Diego
- Pastor v. Empire Today, LLC.
- Moran v. FCA US LLC
- Moran v. FCA US LLC
- Greer v. County of San Diego
- Walsh v. California Energy Development Inc.
- Musgrove v. Hanifin