Hayes
B
99% — 64.5 of 65 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 31% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Strong v. Walgreen Co.
- Johnson v. Colvin
- Stocco v. Gemological Institute of America, Inc.
- Jurewitz v. Bank of America, N.A.
- LMA North America, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
- Simmons v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
- Academy of Our Lady of Peace v. City of San Diego
- Grabowski v. C.H. Robinson Co.
- Stevens v. OPTIMUM HEALTH INSTITUTE-SAN DIEGO
- Barbour v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
- United States v. Uribe-Sanchez
- Anticancer, Inc. v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc.
- Kelly v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
- Chaconas v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
- Sommer v. United States
- Kenneally v. Bank of Nova Scotia
- Love v. Scribner
- Debry v. Department of Homeland Security
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Retail Pro, Inc.
- La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service
- Lorenzo v. Qualcomm Inc.
- Norwood v. Woodford
- Hermanson v. Hunter
- San Diego Minutemen v. California Business, Transportation & Housing Agency's Department of Transportation
- Prest v. Jermstad