Hayes
B
99% — 64.5 of 65 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 31% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- United States v. Carey
- Nino v. United States
- City of San Diego v. Monsanto Co.
- City of San Diego v. Monsanto Co.
- City of Vista v. Gen. Reinsurance Corp.
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Monsanto Co.
- Perez v. Diaz
- Becerra v. General Motors LLC
- Veasley ex rel. Veasley v. United States
- Solo ex rel. Solo v. American Ass'n of University Women
- Mack v. Colvin
- Vrijesh S. Tantuwaya MD, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life & Health Insurance
- Bauer Bros. v. Nike, Inc.
- United States v. Summers
- United States v. Alvarez-Jimenez
- Rollins v. Elephant Productions, Inc. (In re Rollins)
- Perez v. United States
- Schutza v. McDonald's Corp.
- Diunugala v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
- Gonzalez v. Recht Family Partnership
- Robert Half International, Inc. v. Ainsworth
- HSH, Inc. v. City of El Cajon
- Lawrence v. United States Department of the Treasury
- United States v. Castro-Montijo
- YBA Nineteen, LLC v. IndyMac Venture, LLC (In re YBA Nineteen, LLC)