Hall
F
95% — 123.0 of 129 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 91% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1962 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2377, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3296
- Smith v. United States
- United States v. Barnes
- Rank v. (Krug) United States
- Artukovic v. Boyle
- Lasky v. Bew
- People v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
- Kelley v. Hampton
- Poswa v. Jones
- Forrest v. Knox
- Chandler v. Robinett
- Kenison v. Campbell
- Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.
- Allen v. Central Counties Land Co.
- State Commission in Lunacy v. Welch
- State v. Welch
- Oppenheimer v. Radke & Co.
- Royal Insurance v. Caledonian Insurance
- Dougherty v. Clarke
- Sebring v. Harris
- Harrison v. Powers
- Goldwater v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
- Boyer v. Gelhaus
- Kern v. San Francisco Co.
- Bartnett v. Hull