State v. Welch
State Commission in Lunacy v. John Welch, as Treasurer of the County of San Benito, State of California, and Elmer Dowdy, as Auditor of San Benito County
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Benito County
- Trial judge
- M. T. Dooling
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hall (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment entered against plaintiff after order sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint.
The action is in all respects similar to the action No. 1066,ante, p. 624 [129 P. 974], this day decided, except that it covers a different period of time, and the auditor is joined with the treasurer.
For the same reasons stated in the opinion in the action against the treasurer (No. 1066) plaintiff had no capacity to sue either the treasurer or the auditor, and no cause of action is stated against the treasurer. The court, therefore, did not err in sustaining the demurrer, and the judgment must be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 11, 1913.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- State Commission in Lunacy v. Welch Civ. No. 1066. · 1912-12-13