Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Langi CA1/5
- People v. Triana CA1/5
- People v. Webb CA1/5
- Martin v. Martin CA1/5
- Schoenmann v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe CA1/5
- People v. Austin CA1/5
- Rodriguez v. Wong CA1/5
- Mattson Technology, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc.
- People v. Leonard CA1/5
- People v. Morales CA1/5
- City of Benicia v. Diavitas CA1/5
- People v. Montgomery-Sansome CA1/5
- Mattson Technology v. Applied Materials
- People v. Sandoval CA1/5
- R.S. v. Superior Court CA1/5
- Liu v. Shapero CA1/5
- N.G. v. Li CA1/5
- Transition Financial Services v. Wintrust Bank CA1/5
- Transition Financial Services v. Wintrust Bank CA1/5
- In re C.C. CA1/5
- Friends of Muir Woods Park v. County of Marin CA1/5
- People v. Hughes CA1/5
- People v. Slaughter CA1/5
- Asoau v. Tu'ufuli CA1/5
- Williamson v. Genentech, Inc.