Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Perez CA1/5
- People v. Diaz CA1/5
- Amanda F. v. David S. CA1/5
- People v. Medina-Barragan CA1/5
- People v. Randhawa CA1/5
- Fahey v. Uber Technologies CA1/5
- Khedr v. Superior Court
- Khedr v. Superior Court CA1/5
- People v. Castano CA1/5
- People v. Zimmerman CA1/5
- In re Lucas J. CA1/5
- People v. Garcia-Lara CA1/5
- Marriage of Brinton CA1/5
- People v. Herrera CA1/5
- People v. Hsiung
- People v. Hsiung
- People v. Stallworth CA1/5
- People v. Hsiung
- People v. Easley CA1/5
- Gilmore v. Wilshire Quinn Capital CA1/5
- Dent v. City of Alameda Housing Authority CA1/5
- People v. Chamberlin CA1/5
- Binford Road v. Beste CA1/5
- Tawasha v. Select Comfort Retail Corp. CA1/5
- Marriage of Haynes CA1/5