Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Daffeh
- Perez v. It Works Marketing CA1/5
- T.M. v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Roberts CA1/5
- People v. Wallace CA1/5
- People v. Moore
- In re Angelica B. CA1/5
- People v. Mabon CA1/5
- Foroughi v. Creighton CA1/5
- People v. Mabon CA1/5
- People v. Koontzy
- People v. Ward CA1/5
- Byers v. Super. Ct.
- In re Randy C.
- People v. Coleman
- People v. Koontzy
- People v. Serrano
- Zeng v. Wang CA1/5
- People v. Bibiano-Lopez CA1/5
- Balakrishnan v. The Regents of the University of Cal.
- Colvis v. Binswanger CA1/5
- Garaventa v. Binswanger CA1/5
- Hardiman v. The Woodlands Store CA1/5
- Alexia People v. Superior Court CA1/5
- Balakrishnan v. The Regents of the University of Cal. CA1/5 Case Details