Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Hazelle H. v. Superior Court CA1/5
- Hazelle H. v. Superior Court CA1/5
- People v. Ruble CA1/5
- People v. Soun CA1/5
- People v. Goree CA1/5
- Doe v. Acalanes Union High School District CA1/5
- People v. Sarmiento-Zuniga
- People v. Burns CA1/5
- Standage v. Bruno CA1/5
- Ellen E. v. Paul C. CA1/5
- Marriage of Harper and Brown CA1/5
- Cody M. v. County of Sonoma CA1/5
- People v. Quintero
- Jue v. Jue CA1/5
- Marriage of McGovern and Stoller CA1/5
- People v. Romby CA1/5
- Daley v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/5
- People v. Tregaskis CA1/5
- People v. Brennen CA1/5
- People v. Tregaskis CA1/5
- Daley v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/5
- Parenti v. Broadmoor Police Protection District CA1/5
- People v. Wilson CA1/5
- Conservatorship of Sandra L. CA1/5
- Estate of Leon CA1/5