Buchanan
D+
98% — 360.0 of 368 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 65% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. The North River Insurance Company CA4/1
- People v. Hurst CA4/1
- In re P.L.
- Doyle v. San Diego Metropolitan Transit System CA4/1
- People v. Rodriguez CA4/1
- People v. Pettis CA4/1
- People v. Solorio CA4/1
- George v. Ingram Micro Services CA4/1
- People v. Robles CA4/1
- Molinar v. 21st Century Ins. Co.
- People v. Gaillard
- Radovic v. Milosevic CA4/1
- Medel v. Oceanic Companies CA4/1
- People v. Godfrey CA4/1
- People v. Gutierrez CA4/1
- People v. Rouston
- People v. Schemensky CA4/1
- In re H.S. CA4/1
- In re J.H. CA4/1
- People v. Ludwig CA4/1
- Bonds v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Arriero CA4/1
- I.M. v. Michael A. CA4/1
- People v. Dominguez CA4/1
- People v. Dix CA4/1