Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Bender v. U.S. Department of Transportation
- Camargo Alejo v. Vista Detention Facility
- Hearn v. Warden
- Kinnally v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Intrepid Automation, Inc. v. 3D Systems Corporation
- Ossa v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
- Aragon v. DZR Group Inc.
- Ewing v. DME Capital, LLC
- Alkayali v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
- Ewing v. Gitre
- Wilson v. Palomino
- Peterson v. Kijakazi
- Bibbs v. Servantes
- Cash v. Simmons
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Rosales v. Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego
- Munson v. Mercado
- Villalpando v. Kijakazi
- Marin v. The People's Republic of China
- Hodroff v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Sanchez v. Doe
- DeNucci v. Aflac
- Rincon Bohorquez v. Warden of the Otay Mesa Detention Facility
- Ryan v. UC San Diego Medical Center
- Nelson v. Maravai Lifesciences Holdings, Inc.