gno.law

Andrew G. Schopler

District judge · Superior Court of Southern District of California County · 2019–2026

, District Court, S.D. California 2016–

C
99% — 482.5 of 486 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 52% of 51 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

14cases reviewed on appeal
508opinions authored
508panels sat on (not as author)
8%reversed, in whole or part, of 13 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 11 criminal 3

By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases authored (every role)

  1. Herlickman v. Saul 3:19-cv-02446 · 2019-12-30 · civil
  2. Jones v. Social Security Admin 3:19-cv-02288 · 2019-12-05 · civil
  3. Masterson v. Saul 3:19-cv-02200 · 2019-11-25 · civil
  4. Robinson v. City of San Diego 3:18-cv-01918 · 2019-10-16 · civil
  5. Robinson v. City of San Diego 3:18-cv-01918 · 2019-10-11 · civil
  6. Robinson v. City of San Diego 3:18-cv-01918 · 2019-09-27 · civil
  7. Smith v. Saul 3:19-cv-01692-AGS · 2019-09-24 · civil
  8. Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation 3:18-cv-01122 · 2019-08-21 · civil