Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Watson v. City of Santee
- Holt v. Simmons
- Brockman v. County of San Diego
- Rademaker v. Ganzekaufer
- Rademaker v. Ganzekaufer
- Benitez v. Carlos Del Toro
- Krause-Pettai v. Unilever United States, Inc.
- Melendrez v. All Kids Academy
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
- Glenon v. Abbott Laboratories
- Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation
- Justin S. Beck v. State of California
- Sanchez Valle v. Barron
- Beck v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange
- Cash v. Simmons
- Herlickman v. Saul
- Nunez v. Ford Motor Company
- Residential Energy Services Network, Inc. v. Building Science Institute, Ltd. Co.
- family Witzeman v. State of California
- Holt v. Simmons
- Hearn v. Warden
- Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation
- Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney General
- In Re: Silva
- Paris v. Pollard