William v. Gallo
, District Court, S.D. California 2009–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 4 vacated 1 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2021 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc.
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Woods v. Pollard
- Garcia v. Robertson
- Honma Golf U.S., LTD. v. Saddle Creek Corporation
- Murfitt v. Safeco Insurance Company
- Campuzano v. Commissioner of Social Security
- The Doe Run Resources Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
- Valdez v. Zhang
- Cathey v. Berryhill
- Flamme v. Saul
- Andrea Beach v. Andrew Saul
- Valdez v. Zhang
- Shaughnessy v. LVNV Funding, LLC
- McCluer v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
- Hackelton v. Saul
- Rodriguez v. Saul
- Barbee v. Kijakazi
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Farinas v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Davis v. Saidro
- Neal v. AVI-SPL International LLC
- Custom Cabs, Inc. v. Jada Builders Inc.
- DeBose v. Madden
- Nogales v. Becerra