William v. Gallo
, District Court, S.D. California 2009–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 4 vacated 1 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2021 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Sernoffsky v. Novak
- Palmieri v. Kijakazi
- Fernandez v. Duarte
- Keller v. Kijakazi
- Fleischman v. Kijakazi
- Macias v. Lange
- Brown v. Kijakazi
- Williams v. Fisher
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Ewing v. Premium Merchant Funding One, LLC
- Palasi v. Transunion, LLC
- Reeves v. ALLISON
- Martinez v. University of San Diego
- Southern Natural Resources, LLC v. Nations Energy Solutions, Inc
- Nguyen v. Saul
- Russell v. Kijakazi
- Glasoe v. Kijakazi
- Hairston v. Strayhorn
- Southern Natural Resources, LLC v. Nations Energy Solutions, Inc
- Gauthier v. Unknown
- Ingrande v. Kijakazi
- Cejas v. Paramo
- Fernandez v. Progressive Management Systems
- Bracey v. Kijakazi
- Clover v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC