William R. Nevitt, Jr.
A-
81% — 22 of 27 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 14% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
23cases reviewed on appeal
26%reversed, in whole or part, of 19 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 14 reversed in part 3 writ granted 2 writ denied 2 reversed 2
Areas
By year: 2014 12 · 2013 5 · 2016 2 · 2015 2 · 2003 1 · 2002 1 ·
Analysis
36reviewed cases analysed
87rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
5cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Brewer Corp. v. Point Center Mortgage Fund CA4/1
- Ramos v. Garcia
- Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire v. Pointe San Diego Residential Community CA4/1
- Fleming v. Popescu CA4/1
- Dynalectric v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- Kulakowski v. Verimatrix, CA4/1
- Sanchez v. State of Cal. DMV CA4/1
- Jenkins v. Skinner CA4/1
- J.J. v. Co. of San Diego
- Brewer Corp. v. Point Center Financial
- Brewer Corp. v. Point Center Financial
- J.J. v. County of San Diego
- Brewer Corp. v. Point Center Financial, Inc.
- Yashar v. Barnes CA4/1
- National Financial Lending v. Super. Ct.
- National Financial Lending, LLC v. Superior Court
- Friars Village Homeowners v. Hansing
- Fox Johns Lazar Pekin & Wexler, APC v. Superior Court
- Friars Village Homeowners Assn. v. Hansing CA4/1
- McCray v. Metropolitan Transit System CA4/1
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port District
- Palestini v. General Dynamics Corporation