gno.law
William Q. Hayes
Work of Federal Government · source

William Q. Hayes

District judge · Superior Court of Southern District of California County · 2005–2026

Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2003–

D-
98% — 459.5 of 467 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 51 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

176cases reviewed on appeal
528opinions authored
529panels sat on (not as author)
21%reversed, in whole or part, of 154 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 121 reversed 15 vacated 11 reversed in part 7 remanded 5 dismissed 4

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 25 reversed in part 5 vacated 2 reversed 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 94 criminal 76 probate 5 other 1

By year: 2020 18 · 2019 17 · 2018 16 · 2025 14 · 2023 13 · 2024 11 · 2021 10 · 2011 10 · 2010 10 · 2022 9 · 2016 8 · 2017 6 · 2009 6 · 2013 5 · 2008 5 · 2026 4 · 2012 3 · 2006 3 · 2005 3 · 2014 2 · 2007 2 · 2015 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases authored (every role)

  1. Vazquez v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company 3:16-cv-02749 · 2020-04-01 · civil
  2. San Diego Unified Port District v. Monsanto Company 3:15-cv-00578 · 2020-03-26 · civil
  3. San Diego Unified Port District v. Monsanto Company 3:15-cv-00578 · 2020-03-26 · civil
  4. San Diego Unified Port District v. Monsanto Company 3:15-cv-00578 · 2020-03-26 · civil
  5. Bock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 3:19-cv-02241 · 2020-03-17 · civil
  6. Siegel v. Neuschmid 3:18-cv-02493 · 2020-03-06 · civil · other
  7. Aeryon Labs, Inc. v. Datron World Communications, Inc. 3:19-cv-02168 · 2020-03-04 · civil
  8. Kane v. Gastelo 3:19-cv-01354 · 2020-03-03 · civil
  9. Moody v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 3:18-cv-01110 · 2020-03-03 · civil
  10. McCullock v. Brown 3:18-cv-00548 · 2020-03-03 · civil
  11. Sekerke v. Hoodenpyle 3:19-cv-00035 · 2020-02-26 · civil
  12. Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security 3:18-cv-02407 · 2020-02-20 · civil
  13. Rademaker v. Juarez 3:18-cv-01831 · 2020-02-20 · civil
  14. Tilei v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 3:19-cv-01708 · 2020-02-19 · civil
  15. Dragasits v. Rucker 3:18-cv-00512 · 2020-02-13 · civil
  16. Reeves v. ALLISON 3:19-cv-01886 · 2020-02-12 · civil
  17. McCloud v. Bird-Hunt 3:19-cv-00618 · 2020-02-12 · civil
  18. McCloud v. Bird-Hunt 3:19-cv-00618 · 2020-02-12 · civil
  19. Vista Capital Investments, LLC v. Natural Shrimp, Inc. 3:19-cv-01302 · 2020-01-28 · civil
  20. Ratcliffe v. Apex Systems, LLC 3:19-cv-01688 · 2020-01-13 · civil
  21. Reeves v. ALLISON 3:19-cv-01886 · 2020-01-07 · civil · other
  22. Mosby v. San Diego County Admin Center 3:19-cv-01826 · 2020-01-07 · civil
  23. Hunter v. Nature's Way Products, LLC 3:16-cv-00532 · 2020-01-06 · civil
  24. Wyres v. Zhang 3:19-cv-02050 · 2019-12-30 · civil
  25. M Resorts v. New England Life Insurance Company 3:19-cv-01545 · 2019-12-16 · civil