William Q. Hayes
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2003–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 121 reversed 15 vacated 11 reversed in part 7 remanded 5 dismissed 4
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 25 reversed in part 5 vacated 2 reversed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
civil 94 criminal 76 probate 5 other 1
By year: 2020 18 · 2019 17 · 2018 16 · 2025 14 · 2023 13 · 2024 11 · 2021 10 · 2011 10 · 2010 10 · 2022 9 · 2016 8 · 2017 6 · 2009 6 · 2013 5 · 2008 5 · 2026 4 · 2012 3 · 2006 3 · 2005 3 · 2014 2 · 2007 2 · 2015 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc
- Quijada v. Wolf
- Mascrenas v. Wagner
- Polselli v. Aki
- Hylete, Inc. v. Hybrid Athletics, LLC
- Raya v. Calbiotech
- McCloud v. Bird-Hunt
- Bennett v. Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc
- Tilei v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
- Quijada v. Wolf
- Scheuerman v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
- Rosenow v. Facebook, Inc.
- Cejas v. Paramo
- Bradford v. Bracamonte
- Alexandre v. Covello
- (PC) Richardson v. Montgomery
- Brinkley v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
- Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30
- Toney v. Gwathey M.D.
- Moser v. Medguard Alert, Inc.
- Tuck v. Cascadians, Inc.
- Spy Optic Inc. v. AreaTrend, LLC
- Barto v. Miyashiro
- Goolsby v. San Diego, County of
- Mann v. City of Chula Vista