William Q. Hayes
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2003–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 121 reversed 15 vacated 11 reversed in part 7 remanded 5 dismissed 4
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 25 reversed in part 5 vacated 2 reversed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
civil 94 criminal 76 probate 5 other 1
By year: 2020 18 · 2019 17 · 2018 16 · 2025 14 · 2023 13 · 2024 11 · 2021 10 · 2011 10 · 2010 10 · 2022 9 · 2016 8 · 2017 6 · 2009 6 · 2013 5 · 2008 5 · 2026 4 · 2012 3 · 2006 3 · 2005 3 · 2014 2 · 2007 2 · 2015 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Ollison v. County of San Diego
- Sotomayor v. Colvin
- Aton Center, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
- Mascrenas v. Wagner
- Aton Center, Inc. v. Carefirst Bluecross Blueshield
- Nasser v. Elassir
- Nwaigwe v. County of San Diego Child Support Services
- Padilla v. Arredondo
- Cosinero v. Unknown
- Rogers v. Gastelo
- Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc. v. Mohammed
- Arellano v. Paramo
- Hose v. WIS Holdings Corp.
- Dominguez v. Stone Brewing Co., LLC
- Tuck v. Cascadians, Inc.
- HMS Jimmy Wayne LLC
- Valdez v. Doe 1
- Padilla v. Arredondo
- Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc. v. Mohammed
- Paz v. Wolf
- Raya v. Barka
- Arnold v. Hearst Magazine Media, Inc.
- TI, Limited v. Vidanta
- Stein v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
- Olivas v. Whitford