William F. Fahey
A++
provisional — 100% — 2 of 2 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 1% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
107cases reviewed on appeal
31%reversed, in whole or part, of 100 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 68 reversed 23 reversed in part 8 writ granted 3 dismissed 2 other 1 modified 1
Areas
civil 105 probate 1 criminal 1
By year: 2015 13 · 2014 11 · 2016 10 · 2025 9 · 2013 9 · 2022 8 · 2026 7 · 2023 7 · 2020 7 · 2024 6 · 2021 6 · 2018 4 · 2009 4 · 2019 2 · 2017 1 · 2006 1 · 2005 1 · 2003 1 ·
Analysis
2 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Brown v. Goldstein
- Diaz v. Sohnen Enterprises
- Ivory Education Institute v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
- Ivory Education Institute v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
- Schulz v. Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.
- Baskin v. Hughes Realty, Inc.
- Monster v. Super. Ct.
- Doe v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Osborne v. Yasmeh
- Osborne v. Yasmeh
- Baker v. Charles R. Drew University of Med. and Science CA2/2
- Morris v. First Bethany Missionary Baptist Church CA2/3
- Wright Graphics v. Owens CA2/1
- Cordova v. City of Los Angeles CA2
- Mazgani v. S.B.S. Trust Deed Network CA2/3
- RDI, Inc. v. Parsa CA2/3
- Simonyan v. Tiffany & Co. CA2/5
- Karamanoukian v. United Casualty Co. CA2/5
- Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp. v. Kazi CA2/8
- Dolinger v. Murphy CA2/2
- Madrid v. CitiMortgage CA2/3
- Lesh v. Llewellyn Properties CA2/1
- Ralphs Grocery v. Midtown Shopping Center CA2/2
- Figueroa Tower I v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn. CA2/5
- Wong v. Tam CA2/8