William F. Fahey
A++
provisional — 100% — 2 of 2 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 1% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
107cases reviewed on appeal
31%reversed, in whole or part, of 100 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 68 reversed 23 reversed in part 8 writ granted 3 dismissed 2 other 1 modified 1
Areas
civil 105 probate 1 criminal 1
By year: 2015 13 · 2014 11 · 2016 10 · 2025 9 · 2013 9 · 2022 8 · 2026 7 · 2023 7 · 2020 7 · 2024 6 · 2021 6 · 2018 4 · 2009 4 · 2019 2 · 2017 1 · 2006 1 · 2005 1 · 2003 1 ·
Analysis
2 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Dima v. Grasshopper House CA2/3
- Soltanabadi v. Aminpour CA2/1
- Soltanabadi v. Aminpour CA2/1
- Max v. Shih CA2/1
- Vasquez v. Janelle Investment CA2/3
- Reyes-Gonzalez v. Color Marble CA2/7
- Frankland v. Etehad
- L.A. College Faculty Guild, etc. v. L.A. Community College Dist. CA2/8
- Mondragon v. Let's Do Lunch CA2/5
- L.A. College Faculty Guild etc. v. L.A. Community College Dist. CA2/8
- Manos v. J Paul Getty Trust CA2/5
- Harris v. Proskauer Rose LLP CA2/5
- Bogota Corporation v. Seiden CA2/1
- KPMC v. Chaudhari CA2/3
- Welty v. Offspring CA2/2
- Green v. Green CA2/2
- Aguila v. Nong CA2/1
- Redondo v. County of Los Angeles CA2/2
- Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles CA2/2
- East Coast Foods v. KG Law CA2/4
- Ballou v. Verizon Wireless Services CA2/2
- State of Cal. v. Encino Hospital Medical Center
- Ressler v. Piontak CA2/8
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Structured Asset Sales
- City of Los Angeles v. Patel CA2/1