
Curtis D. Wilbur
Judge, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1929–1954 · Judge, California Supreme Court 1918–1924
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
363opinions authored
417panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Cavanagh v. Shaver
- People v. Valcalda
- People v. Mayen
- Cotton-Macauley Co. v. Deshields
- Potter v. Chambers
- Stark v. Shemada
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.
- People Ex Rel Coe v. City of Los Angeles
- Skidmore v. West
- Mora v. Favilla
- Moore Shipbuilding Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n
- Veysey v. Moriyama
- Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.
- Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Hines v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San Francisco
- Brimberry v. Dudfield Lumber Co.
- Western Indemnity Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Mundell v. Lyons
- Green v. South San Francisco Railroad & Power Co.
- Burrows v. Petroleum Development Co.
- Hurlbut v. Quigley
- Neidlein v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Beggs v. Superior Court