
Curtis D. Wilbur
Judge, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1929–1954 · Judge, California Supreme Court 1918–1924
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
363opinions authored
417panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Union Oil Co. of California v. Pac. Sur. Co.
- Tucker v. Scott
- Western Salt Co. v. City of San Diego
- In Re Estate of Page
- Moss v. Smith
- Honore v. Lemm
- Stock v. Plunkett
- National Bank of San Mateo v. Whitney
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Nichols v. Moore
- Benjamin v. Walton
- Casey v. Hanley
- Gaume v. Sheets
- In Re Rust
- Silverstin v. Kohler & Chase
- Lemle v. Barry
- Lemle v. Barry
- Coleman v. County of Los Angeles
- Drew v. Superior Court of Mendocino County
- Cole v. City of Los Angeles
- Service v. Bedros
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Bufkin v. Cline
- Hartfield v. Howard
- Hutchinson Co. v. Gould