Weinberger
F++
96% — 53.0 of 55 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 81% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Piazza Properties, Ltd. v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
- Fogo v. Cutter Laboratories, Inc.
- Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.
- Hellman v. Great American Insurance
- Palo Alto-Menlo Park Yellow Cab Co. v. Santa Clara County Transit District
- Save Our Skyline v. Board of Permit Appeals
- Myers v. Board of Supervisors
- Stills v. Gratton
- Chilton v. Contra Costa Community College District
- Philippart v. Hotchkiss Tract Reclamation District 799
- Amluxen v. Regents of University of California
- Buckley v. Timothy N.
- Fox v. City and County of San Francisco
- People v. Donahue
- Younger v. Berkeley City Council
- Spott Electrical Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.
- Williams v. Superior Court
- Roumbanis v. Superior Court
- Ponce v. Tractor Supply Co.
- People v. Superior Court
- Perry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
- Martin v. California Department of Employment
- Quibell v. United States
- Lynch v. United States
- In re Zamora