Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Williams v. Moulton Niguel Water Dist.
- Weiler v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services
- 1901 First Street Owner, LLC v. Tustin Unified School District
- 1901 First Street Owner v. Tustin Unified School District
- MMM Holdings, Inc. v. Reich
- Avila v. Southern Cal. Specialty Care, Inc.
- O'Malley v. Hospitality Staffing Solutions
- People v. Arevalo
- People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.
- Stirling v. Brown
- Kirzhner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
- People v. Hicks
- Yelp Inc. v. Superior Court
- In re Dean W.
- People v. Drew
- In re Marriage of Mendoza & Cuellar
- Curci Investments v. Baldwin
- Santa Ana Police Off. Assn. v. City of Santa Ana.
- Santa Ana Police Off. Assn. v. City of Santa Ana.
- Zubillaga v. Allstate Indemnity Company
- Garcia v. Pexco, LLC
- People v. Vela
- Sumrall v. Modern Alloys, Inc.
- McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange County
- Sumrall v. Modern Alloys, Inc.