Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.
- Jozefowicz v. Allstate Ins. Co.
- In re E.P.
- Dane-Elec Corp. v. Bodokh
- Colombo v. Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs
- County of Orange v. Seneca Insurance Co.
- Mercury Insurance Co. v. Lara
- Mercury Insurance Co. v. Lara
- People v. Mazumder
- Martinez v. O'Hara
- Yu v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.
- In re E.P.
- People v. McClinton
- In re E.P.
- People v. Sun
- People v. McClinton
- People v. Cisneros-Ramirez
- Orange Catholic Foundation v. Arvizu
- In re Loza
- People v. Frahs
- In re Marriage of Kushesh & Kushesh-Kaviani
- Wassmann v. South Orange County Community College Dist.
- In re E.P.
- Prince v. Invensure Ins. Brokers
- Williams v. Moulton Niguel Water Dist.