Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Thompson CA4/3
- Rivera v. Shivers
- People v. Cardenas CA4/3
- People v. Phi CA4/3
- People v. Luciozamudio CA4/3
- People v. Bernal CA4/3
- Nealy v. County of Orange CA4/3
- People v. Gray CA4/3
- Street v. Greer CA4/3
- Marriage of Shio CA4/3
- People v. Norris CA4/3
- People v. Prasad CA4/3
- Kec v. Superior Court
- People v. Mayfield
- Sandlin v. McLaughlin
- Lak v. Lak
- People v. Prado
- In re Duval
- Southern Cal. Pizza Co., LLC v. Certain Underwriters, etc.
- People v. Force
- In re Vaquera
- People v. Flores
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform v. The Irvine Co.
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.
- Mercury Ins. Co. v. Lara