Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Price CA4/3
- People v. Sandoval CA4/3
- Lopez v. Lake Forest Keys CA4/3
- In re R.W. CA4/3
- Prickett v. Bonnier Corp.
- People v. Price CA4/3
- Smith v. SATRA CA4/3
- Marriage of Richards CA4/3
- 20 In re T.M. CA4/3
- Haghighi v. Gough CA4/3
- People v. Lish CA4/3
- Ramirez v. CL Education CA4/3
- People v. Miranda CA4/3
- Cabral v. Mendez CA4/3
- Castro v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. CA4/3
- Johnson v. County of Orange CA4/3
- People v. Palomino CA4/3
- People v. Spurlock CA4/3
- People v. Alcala CA4/3
- Multani v. DeCuollo CA4/3
- People v. Ho CA4/3
- People v. Odisho CA4/3
- Nealy v. County of Orange
- People v. Mendez CA4/1
- Williams v. Harden CA4/3