Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Soc. Servs. Local 535 v. Bd. of Supervisors of Santa Barbara Cty.
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. International Harvester Co.
- Birnbaum v. Lackner
- Hollister Park Inv. Co. v. Goleta Cty. Water Dist.
- Weekes v. City of Oakland
- People v. Gonzalez
- Neal v. Brown
- People v. Barkins
- United States v. Hawthorne
- United States v. 129.4 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Yuma, State of Arizona, and Fred W. Kamrath, and Unknown Owners
- United States v. Ocean Electronics Corp.
- Jesse W. v. Superior Court
- United States v. Ocean Electronics Corp.
- Gray v. Califano
- Haskel Engineering & Supply Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
- HASKEL ENG'G & SUPPLY v. Hartford Acc. & Indem.
- Kessler v. Gray
- People v. Municipal Court (Byars)
- IBM Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- Greek Theatre Assn. v. County of Los Angeles
- Pepper v. Superior Court
- People v. Wolfenbarger
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. Superior Court
- Hirsch v. Blish
- People v. Fraijo