Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- P. v. Alvarez CA4/3
- Henry v. Murphy CA4/3
- McCaslin v. England CA4/3
- Williams v. State of California CA4/3
- Spyksma v. Sousamian CA4/3
- P. v. Sanchez CA4/3
- In re Israel M. CA4/3
- P. v. Avetoom CA4/3
- Lobel Financial v. Baltazar CA4/3
- P. v. Gonzalez CA4/3
- Russell v. Litzinger CA4/3
- Sroka v. Bank of America CA4/3
- Estate of Focarino CA4/3
- People v. Martinez CA4/3
- Brennan v. U.S. TelePacific Corp. CA4/3
- People v. Chambers CA4/3
- James Ray Moore v. Derrick Ollison
- United States v. Bradley Dierking
- United States v. Eleazar Felix-Olivas
- United States v. Juvenile Female
- Perretta v. Prometheus Development Co.
- Evans v. Grossmont Union High School District
- United States v. Kory Ray Smith
- United States v. William Nelson Davis
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation