Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Sedewick v. Bank of America CA4/3
- P. v. Zamora CA4/3
- Baughman v. Walt Disney World
- P. v. Lucero CA4/3
- Shelley J. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3
- P. v. Cho CA4/3
- P. v. Mercado CA4/3
- The People v. Perez
- P. v. Yin CA4/3
- P. v. Silberman CA4/3
- P. v. Brents CA4/3
- P. v. Canchola CA4/3
- P. v. Dinh CA4/3
- Campbell v. Campbell CA4/3
- De La Rosa v. Able Acquisition CA4/3
- P. v. Liwanag CA4/3
- SFPP v. Public Util. Com.
- P. v. Villapando CA4/3
- G v. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3
- P. v. Guerrero CA4/3
- P. v. Rios CA4/3
- Bowers Companies Wage and Hour Cases CA4/3
- Jobe v. Kronsberg CA4/3
- In re Anthony B. CA4/3
- County of San Diego v. Lumbermans Mutual CA4/3