Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Ocampo CA4/3
- People v. Daly CA4/3
- Arreola v. One More Productions CA4/3
- Sharifpour v. Le
- In re Timothy G. CA4/3
- Sporn v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA4/3
- JCM Farming v. Fantasy Balloon Flights CA4/3
- Monex Deposit Co. v. Parsons CA4/3
- People v. Lobos CA4/3
- Ponce v. Philco Construction CA4/3
- People v. Sanchez
- Nissan Motor Acceptance v. Superior Automotive Group CA4/3
- Amanda F. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3
- People v. Perez CA4/3
- People v. Tlamasico CA4/3
- In re S.S. CA4/3
- Sharifpour v. Le CA4/3
- People v. Farr CA4/3
- People v. Hernandez CA4/3
- G8 REO Fund v. Bauer Properties CA4/3
- People v. Heirendt CA4/3
- V.C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3
- People v. Jessee
- A.C. v. Superior Court CA4/3
- Mac Beam, Inc. v. Cadovimex USA GJ Trade Co. CA4/3