Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Smith CA4/3
- Williams v. Cahill CA4/3
- People v. Morrone CA4/3
- People v. Aguirre CA4/3
- People v. Richards CA4/3
- Solus Industrial v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Reynolds CA4/3
- People v. Hernandez CA4/3
- People v. Garcia CA4/3
- People v. Lara CA4/3
- Yu v. Century Surety CA4/3
- People v. Foust CA4/3
- Patamakanthin v. Gianulas CA4/3
- Herrera v. A&P Auto Sales CA4/3
- People v. Aguirre CA4/3
- People v. Butler CA4/3
- People v. Christian CA4/3
- People v. Clody CA4/3
- People v. Hammock CA4/3
- Yildiz v. AKW Fueling CA4/3
- Solus Industrial v. Super. Ct.
- Sporn v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/3
- In re G v. CA4/3
- In re Santos G. CA4/3
- Marriage of Foladpour and Hashemi CA4/3