Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Sanders v. Langmuir-Logan CA4/3
- Sanders v. Langmuir-Logan CA4/3
- People v. Nicolas CA4/3
- People v. Ruelas CA4/3
- Wells Fargo Bank Nat. Assn. v. Mirrafati CA4/3
- Adoption of S.L. CA4/1
- People v. Tirey
- People v. Tirey
- N.D. v. Regional Center of Orange County CA4/3
- People v. Gonzalez
- Coleman v. Woosley CA4/3
- People v. Boyzo CA4/3
- Shih v. Lin CA4/3
- People v. Tirey
- In re Jacob C. CA4/3
- People v. Kincaid CA4/3
- In re Natalie C. CA4/3
- People v. Benedict CA4/3
- People v. Whatley CA4/3
- Tribolet v. Salas CA4/3
- People v. Threlkeld CA4/3
- Jaffer v. Klems CA4/3
- People v. Craddock CA4/3
- Rochefort v. Chandler CA4/3
- Sun v. Electro Medical Instrumentation Corp. CA4/3