Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Antes CA4/3
- People v. Naposki CA4/3
- In re Christensen CA4/3
- People v. Mihajson CA4/3
- People v. Duong CA4/3
- People v. Hernandez CA4/3
- People v. Purdie CA4/3
- People v. Martin CA4/3
- The Joint Equity Committee v. Genovese CA4/3
- Yu v. Landmark American Ins. Co. CA4/3
- Moran v. Stetler CA4/3
- In re Freddy M. CA4/3
- Rebolledo v. Tilly's, Inc.
- People v. Hernandez
- Leonard v. Waterloo CA4/3
- People v. James CA4/3
- People v. Melendez CA4/3
- People v. Hernandez
- People v. Kieu CA4/3
- People v. Valencia CA4/3
- People v. Gates CA4/3
- Anaheim Ducks Hockey Club v. DS Waters of America CA4/3
- Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School Dist. v. N. Orange Cty. Regional Occupational Program CA4/3
- Estate of Katz CA4/3
- People v. Trujillo CA4/3