Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Fiset CA4/3
- Shank v. CRST Van Expedited CA4/3
- W&Z Development v. Aztec Group CA4/3
- In re Nicolas C. CA4/3
- People v. Dominguez CA4/3
- People v. Campos CA4/3
- People v. Superior Court of Orange County
- Marriage of Shokoohy and Rahgoshay CA4/3
- Swanson v. Morongo Unif. School Dist.
- People v. Valerio & Kelly CA4/3
- Sadeghi v. Snell CA4/3
- People v. Fiset CA4/3
- Old Republic Nat. Title Co. v. Thomas CA4/1
- Marriage of McCallon CA4/3
- People v. Mroczko CA4/3
- Marriage of Bustillo CA4/3
- In re S.G. CA4/3
- People v. Gray CA4/3
- Yu v. Interstate Fire and Casualty Co. CA4/3
- People v. Clody CA4/3
- In re A.R. CA4/3
- People v. Bowles CA4/3
- Sidler v. RJT Investment Services CA4/3
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co. CA4/3
- In re Andrew v. CA4/3