Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Riverside Sheriff's Assn. v. County of Riverside CA4/3
- People v. Morris CA4/3
- Tamas v. Safeway
- People v. Olaiz CA4/3
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co. CA4/3
- Boling v. DTG Operations CA4/3
- Boling v. DTG Operations CA4/3
- People v. Castilleja CA3
- People v. Montes CA4/3
- Rodgers v. Riverside Co. CA4/3
- People v. Loeza CA4/3
- Tamas v. Safeway CA4/3
- People v. Pink CA4/3
- People v. Nateghi CA4/3
- People v. Lopez CA4/3
- Luckey v. Plaza Bank CA4/3
- Solsby v. Plaza Bank CA4/3
- Gerard v. Orange Coast Mem. Medical Center
- People v. Pompa CA4/2
- People v. Salazar CA4/2
- Marriage of Graham CA4/3
- People v. Leyva CA4/3
- Rodgers v. Riverside County CA4/3
- W&Z Development Corp. v. Aztec Group, Inc. CA4/3
- Noval v. Frost CA4/3