Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- San Felipe Farms v. LLY Ranch CA4/3
- L.R. v. Superior Court CA4/3
- Medina v. Superior Court
- Yebba v. AHMC Healthcare CA4/3
- SCSA Group v. Worden CA4/3
- Brodkin v. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange CA4/3
- Chmait v. Heritage Asset Management CA4/3
- Jeronimo v. Alliance Credit Union CA4/3
- People v. Barnett CA4/3
- People v. Sanchez CA4/3
- People v. Warbrick CA4/3
- People v. Nguyen CA4/3
- Linovitz Capo Shores LLC v. California Coastal Commission
- People v. Castillo CA4/3
- Timmins v. Zheng CA4/3
- People v. Valadez CA4/3
- Horner v. Bank of New York Mellon CA4/3
- In re G.R. CA4/3
- People v. Soriano
- People v. Thompson CA4/3
- Leiba v. Gann CA4/3
- People v. Chandler CA4/3
- People v. Vo CA4/3
- Hirzallah v. The Regents of the University of Cal. CA4/3
- Marriage of Koury CA4/3