Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Capistrano Taxpayers v. City of San Juan Capistrano
- Sukhov v. Sukhov CA4/3
- People v. Aragon CA4/3
- People v. Rogel CA4/3
- In re Isabella A. CA4/3
- Melinda C. v. Super. Ct.CA4/3
- Inhale, Inc. v. Worldwide Smoke, Inc. CA4/3
- McVeigh v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana CA4/3
- In re C.O. CA4/3
- People v. Ojeda CA4/3
- People v. Duran CA4/3
- Sukhov v. Sukhov CA4/3
- Marriage of Wulf CA4/3
- People v. Delacerda
- Capistrano Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of San Juan Capistrano
- People v. Flores CA4/3
- Marriage of Jones and Ballard CA4/3
- People v. Sledge
- ABC Money Transactions v. Barilla CA4/3
- People v. Tombleson CA4/3
- Novak v. Bank of America CA4/3
- People v. Ferguson CA4/3
- People v. Nazario CA4/3
- de Langis v. Hermanne CA4/3
- People v. Rodecker CA4/3