Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Navarro CA4/3
- In re Lopez
- People v. Burgins CA4/3
- Sadr v. Sabet CA4/3
- People v. Erro CA4/3
- People v. Aparicio CA4/3
- Cottonwood Capital Property Management v. Superior Court CA4/3
- In re A.B. CA4/3
- In re Abel R. CA4/2
- Holmes v. Renzullo CA4/3
- People v. Dearing CA4/3
- Ammerman v. Callender
- People v. Espinoza CA4/3
- People v. Wahidi CA4/3
- In re Michael L. CA4/3
- People v. Soto CA4/3
- People v. Delgado CA4/3
- People v. White CA4/3
- People v. Galloway CA4/3
- People v. Brown CA4/3
- People v. Garcia CA4/3
- People v. Thompson CA4/3
- People v. Navarro
- Shimkus v. Shimkus
- In re Kocontes