Thomas P. Nugent
A--
79% — 44 of 56 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 19% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
22cases reviewed on appeal
36%reversed, in whole or part, of 22 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 14 reversed 6 reversed in part 2
Areas
By year: 2013 11 · 2014 8 · 2009 1 · 2007 1 · 2004 1 ·
Analysis
42reviewed cases analysed
153rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
8cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Ramos v. Oatey CA4/1
- Tinoco v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. CA4/1
- Shapiro v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1
- Klahn v. Kimco Realty Corp. CA4/1
- Spot Water Management v. Plageman CA4/1
- San Diego Assemblers v. Work Comp for Less Ins.
- San Diego Assemblers v. Work Comp for Less Ins.
- San Diego Assemblers, Inc. v. Work Comp for Less Insurance Services, Inc.
- Living Green Growers v. Valley Center CA4/1
- Bielasz v. Mestler Construction CA4/1
- Rancho Heights Road Maintenance Committee v. Taufer CA4/1
- Orozco v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/1
- Ulloa v. McMillin Real Estate & Mortgage, Inc.
- Korea Water Resources Corp. v. Chong Sung Lee