Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Abbott v. Jack
- Richards v. Fraser
- Moffitt v. Rosencrans
- Patterson v. Mills
- People v. Carpenter
- McDonald v. Porsh
- Rice v. Meiners
- Ventura Land & Power Co. v. Meiners
- Hayes v. Silver Creek & Panoche Land & Water Co.
- People v. Eaton
- Blakeman v. Miller
- Williamson v. Strong
- Boscow v. Patton
- Collins v. O'Laverty
- Quint v. Dimond
- Banta v. Wise
- Blanchard v. Ladd
- W. W. Montague & Co. v. Leonard
- Blanchard v. Ladd
- De Haven v. Berendes
- Foster v. Carr
- People v. Tilley
- Hunt v. Davis
- Blizzard v. Drinkhouse
- People v. McFarlane