Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Franklin Figueroa-Montes
- Genghis Khan Stevenson v. Duran Harmon
- Genghis Khan Stevenson v. R. Harmon
- Gregory Rideau, Jr. v. Larry Small
- Rodney Barno v. Stuart Ryan
- United States v. Pedro Sanchez-Zarate
- United States v. Raymundo Rodriguez-Aguirre
- United States v. Mario Ochoa-Lopez
- Elmer Seevers v. United States
- United States v. Luis Hernandez-Rios
- United States v. Ernesto Lopez-Figueroa
- United States v. Serafin Hernandez-Garcia
- United States v. Ricardo Solis-Morales
- United States v. Roberto Acevedo-Rodriguez
- United States v. Juvenile Male
- United States v. Jesus Herrera-Torres
- United States v. Jose Perez-Ramos
- Barry Jameson v. James Yates
- James Mincoff v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
- Wagoner v. Carey
- United States v. Jessica Alfaro
- United States v. Felipe Olvera-Campos
- United States v. Arnulfo Murillo-Cuellar
- United States v. Joaquin Paramo-Maciel
- United States v. David Frias-Hernandez