Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Pardue CA5
- People v. Lopez CA5
- People v. Martin CA5
- People v. Martinez CA5
- Rodrigues v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol CA5
- People v. Blake CA5
- In re D.F. CA5
- In re D.O. CA5
- People v. Reck CA5
- Winton-Ireland Insurance Agency v. Pallante CA5
- People v. Rangel CA5
- Delis v. Thorn CA5
- People v. Anderson CA5
- People v. Castillo CA5
- People v. Hughes CA5
- People v. Blake CA5
- People v. Alvarez CA5
- People v. Maldonado CA5
- People v. Vera CA5
- Westlands Water Dist. v. North Coast Rivers Alliance CA5
- Westlands Water District v. All Persons Interested etc. CA5
- Rocha v. County of Fresno CA5
- People v. Rodriguez CA5
- Jimenez v. Patino CA5
- People v. Gonzalez CA5