Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Matrunich v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
- United States v. Jose Medina-Rivera
- Gerald Keeler v. Sierra Conservation Center
- United States v. Edgar Srapyan
- Epps v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
- Jack Solomon v. Judy Goffman Cutler
- Oyeniran v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
- United States v. Pascual Francisco-Pascual
- United States v. Alejandro Martinez-Castro
- Carla Longerbeam v. Michael Astrue
- United States v. Guadalupe Bravo-Perez
- Ocie Wright, Jr. v. Michael D. McDonald Warden
- Tyson v. Holder
- Cole Ex Rel. Estate of Bearcrane v. Oravec
- Fossen v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
- Carlos Corona v. V. Almager
- United States v. Santini
- Rodney Jelinek v. Capital Research & Management
- United States v. Antonio Ciranda-Sanchez
- John Scannell V.
- Bradley Marshall v. Washington State Bar Associati
- United States v. Marguet-Pillado
- United States v. Adrian Aguilar-Rivera
- United States v. William Calderon-Perez