Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Juan Vasquez-Hernandez
- United States v. Fernando Morales-Aguilar
- United States v. Jose Cortez
- Stewart v. California Deptartment of Education
- United States v. Gonzalo Anaya-Santiago
- United States v. Efren Ochoa-Gembe
- United States v. Victor Manuel Sanchez Valle
- Meruelo v. Commissioner
- United States v. Mikel Bolander
- Drew v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
- United States v. Gabriel Garcia-Ocampo
- United States v. David Grummer
- United States v. Raymond Lozano
- Ordonez v. United States
- Bryan Ransom v. Gray
- United States v. Nelson Miranda-Lopez
- United States v. Edgar Rivera
- United States v. Severiano Rodriguez-Quinones
- United States v. Bernardo Deleon-Torres
- United States v. Huping Zhou
- Wood v. City of San Diego
- Alioto v. Associated Creditors Exchange Inc.
- Eugene Linder v. Bill Donat
- Ronal Kiskila v. United States
- Thien Ton v. Eric Holder, Jr.