Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Michael Ramirez
- United States v. Mario Zapata
- United States v. Jose Ortiz
- Michelle Cameron v. Michelle Craig
- Progressive West Insurance Com v. Craig Tiscareno
- Lisa Demaree v. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
- United States v. Leilani Quintos
- Matilde Carrillo De Palacios v. Eric Holder, Jr.
- Frank Vaughn v. J. Woodford
- United States v. Miguel Garibay
- United States v. Jorge Farias
- United States v. Mark Hauze
- United States v. Juan Flores-Acuna
- Pacific Asian Enterprises v. Cross Chartering Nv
- United States v. John Maloney
- Fraihat Abdallah v. Cohen
- United States v. Michael Benoit
- Dorsey v. Catholic Health Care West Mercy Hospital & Medical Center
- Dorsey v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Darryl Dunsmore v. San Diego County Sheriff's Dep
- Edwin Gonzalez v. John Doe
- United States v. Toni MacIel
- United States v. Alfonso Cruz-Gregorio
- United States v. Uriel Rivera
- United States v. Pedro Santos