Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Raul Cortes-Rios
- United States v. Victor Vega-Soto
- United States v. Francisco Beltran Valdez
- United States v. Guillermo Zavala-Bolanos
- United States v. Hector Casimiro
- United States v. Steven Hicks
- The People v. Crabtree CA4/2
- United States v. Owen Dunn
- United States v. Alaa El Beialy
- Cameron Reed v. United States
- Tamer Salameh v. Tarsadia Hotel
- Jose Romero-Almanza, Etc. v. Eric Holder, Jr.
- United States v. Patrick Jones
- Parrakkamannil Varghese v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
- Michael Seneca v. First Franklin Financial Corp
- Francie Moeller v. Taco Bell Corp.
- United States v. Daniel Salinas-Vargas
- Martin Vazquez v. B. Koen
- Matthew Johnson v. Darr
- Samuel Porter v. Muabe Howard
- Brian Kenner v. E. Kelly
- Robert Lemke v. Charles Ryan
- Fourth Investment Lp v. United States
- United States v. Lorenzo Galindo-Vega
- United States v. Gabriel Garcia-Ocampo