Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Juan De La Torre-Flores v. Janet Napolitano
- People v. Dlugitch CA4/2
- Valdez v. Kismet Acquisition, LLC (In Re Icenhower)
- United States v. Carlos Dominguez-Maroyoqui
- Kelly Van v. James Cameron
- United States v. Aida Castro
- United States v. Robert McGill
- United States v. David Tran
- United States v. Juan Morales-Isabarras
- United States v. Brent Wilkes
- United States v. John Maloney
- Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.
- Webceleb v. the Procter & Gamble Company
- United States v. Adrian Espinoza-Estrada
- United States v. Mark Gonzales
- United States v. Enrique Mercado-Cuen
- United States v. James Mincoff
- Ventura v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc.
- United States v. Rachel Wyly
- Paul Adams v. Larry Small
- Gustavo McKenzie v. G. Ellis
- United States v. Anabel Ocegueda
- United States v. Francisco Mendez-Avalos
- United States v. Harry Redds, Jr.
- United States v. Martha Rosales