Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Diego Beltran
- United States v. Gabriel Ruiz-Gerardo
- United States v. Jesse Garcia
- United States v. Luis Lopez-Medina
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High School
- Brandon Armitage v. Kenneth Clark
- United States v. Marco Luis
- Fine v. Cambridge International Systems, Inc.
- United States v. Irma Reyes-Solosa
- Alison Terry v. City of San Diego
- Kismet Acquisition, LLC v. Icenhower (In Re Icenhower)
- Kismet Acquisition v. Alejandro Diaz-Barba
- United States v. Froy Serrato-Cesareo
- United States v. Mauricio Castillo-Cansino
- United States v. George Parker
- United States v. Eric Lopez
- California Ex Rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District v. U.S. Department of the Interior
- Nrg Energy, Inc. v. Jerry Fuchs
- United States v. Salvador Hernandez-Estrada
- United States v. Jorge Thum
- United States v. Juan Rodriguez-Frias
- Ron Voss v. Jerry Knotts
- Rodney Barno v. George Neotti
- Anthony Hill v. Domingo Uribe
- United States v. Ricardo Espino-Ibarra